If Joe Biden wins the election, he will assume office at the age of 78. During his term, as the oldest person to become president, he may succumb to infirmity or, worse, the coronavirus, and Kamala Harris would ascend to the presidency.
How would President Harris govern?
1. She would use every opportunity to highlight African or Hispanic victimhood.
On January 29, 2019, Jussie Smollett told police that 2 supporters of Donald Trump had assaulted him. Because Smollett is African, Harris did not wait for the outcome of the police investigation and promptly declared that the alleged incident is an "attempted modern-day lynching".
Later, the investigation determined that Smollet had paid 2 friends to stage the attack. It was a hoax. [1] [2]
2. She would maintain or expand affirmative action and other forms of preferential treatment for Africans and Hispanics.
On November 4, 2015, Harris filed an amicus brief in the Supreme Court to persuade the Justices to rule against Abigail Fisher in her attempt to terminate affirmative action at the University of Texas. [3]
Also, Harris supports a recent Californian bill (which her political ally, Governor Gavin Newsom, signed into law on September 30, 2020) that specifies a quota for Africans and HIspanics on the boards of directors for companies headquartered in California. [4]
Harris supports Proportion 16 (on the 2020 ballot in California), which allows preferential treatment for Africans and Hispanics in public hiring, contracting, and college admissions. [5]
3. She would maintain "open borders".
At a confirmation hearing on November 15, 2018, Harris asserted that Immigration and Customs Enforcement has the same operating principle as the Ku Klux Klan. She insinuated that attempts to enforce the border are tantamount to terrorizing Africans and Hispanics. [6]
4. She would use government mandates to curtail civil liberties.
On July 4, 2019, Harris declared support for federally mandated busing. It violates the right of your child to freedom of association with the school of his or your choosing. [7]
Further, Harris supports using draconian lockdowns (like that imposed by Governor Gavin Newsom) to combat the coronavirus. Lockdowns curtail civil liberties by forcing citizens to shutdown private businesses, by mandating the use of masks, etc. [8]
5. She would shift responsibility from the individual to the government.
Harris claims that 215,000 Americans succumbed to the coronavirus due to the incompetence of the presidential administration. She specifically accuses Donald Trump of causing those deaths.
Yet, an effective response to the coronavirus primarily depends on the proper behavior of ordinary Americans, not politicians. Each individual must take responsibility to act responsibly; it cannot be transferred to the government.
The impact of Harris' governance would be transforming the United States into a country that is inhospitable for European-Americans and assimilated East-Asian-Americans. Europeans would shoulder all the blame for the underperformance of Africans and Hispanics. The presidential administration would directly or indirectly (via affirmative action) transfer resources from Europeans and East Asians to Africans and Hispanics to compensate for their underperformance. The "open borders" would facilitate swelling the ranks of underperforming ethnicities or races.
All the while, President Harris would claim that the underperformance of Africans and Hispanics is not due to their misbehavior but is due to the government's not doing enough for them.
As Senator, Harris has used that claim to explain away the fact that Africans and Hispanics constitute a disproportionately large percentage of coronavirus deaths. The situation in Japan proves that her claim is false. Prime Minister Shinzo Abe did little more than President Donald Trump in combating the coronavirus, yet the Japanese death rate due to the coronavirus is only about 2% of the American rate (where rate is death count divided by the population count). As of October 13, only about 1,631 Japanese have succumbed to the coronavirus. The excellent personal hygiene and courteousness (like covering nose and mouth during a cough) of the ordinary Japanese greatly inhibited the spread of the coronavirus to vulnerable groups like the elderly.
Under the leadership of President Harris, the United States would degenerate into a nation like Malaysia or Mexico. As a European-American or East-Asian-American parent, do you want your children to live in the kind of country that Donald Trump describes as a "shithole"?
The choice in the 2020 election is between President Kamala Harris (replacing an ailing President Joe Biden) and President Donald Trump. You may be tempted to support Harris because Trump has an extremely boorish personality. Yet, despite his faults, Trump has tried to ensure that American society is hospitable for you and your children.
Before you cast your vote, ask yourself, "Do I love my children more than I hate Trump's personality?" If the answer is "yes", then hold your nose and choose Trump for the sake of your children.
note1. Jennifer Earl, "Kamala Harris on Jussie Smollett charges being dropped: 'I'm completely confused'", Fox News, 2019 March 27.
2. Paul Best, "Flashback: Kamala Harris once called Jussie Smollett's claims of an attack an 'attempted modern day lynching'", Fox News, 2020 Auguest 11.
3. "Attorney General Kamala D. Harris Files Brief in U.S. Supreme Court Affirmative Action Case, Fisher v. University of Texas>", State of California Department of Justice, 2015 November 4.
4. Patrick McGreevy, "Newsom signs law mandating more diversity in California corporate boardrooms", Los Angeles Times, 2020 Septembr 30.
5. Michael R Blood, "Election could move California further left on taxes, race", Associated Press. 2020 September 30.
6. Adam Shaw, "Flashback: Kamala Harris compared ICE to KKK in Senate hearing", Fox News, 2020 August 11.
7. Matt Stevens, "When Kamala Harris and Joe Biden Clashed on Busing and Segregation", New York Times, 2019 July 31.
8. Matt Stevens, "Harris said 'nobody's going to be punished’ for violating proposed mask mandate.", New York Times, 2020 August 28.
No comments:
Post a Comment