Support for The Clear Sky

Maintaining this blog, The Clear Sky, requires significant time and money. To support our efforts, please purchase an item at Amazon via the Web links at The Clear Sky.

Cruelty of the Chinese and the Indians

On 2022 February 24, the Russian military invaded Ukraine and began ruthlessly killing Ukrainians. By March 11, "34 hospitals, 202 schools, and more than 1,500 residential buildings have been destroyed. Around two million people have fled to Eastern Europe — mostly women, children and the elderly. At least 500 civilians are dead, with hundreds more injured, and thousands hiding in underground bunkers because Russian forces fire indiscriminately, even — or perhaps especially — in the so-called 'humanitarian corridors'." [1]

A typical example of the Russian brutality is the bombing of a maternity hospital in Mariupol. [2] The blast fatally injured a pregnant woman. "Surgeon Timur Marin found the woman's pelvis crushed and hip detached. Medics delivered the baby via caesarean section, but it showed 'no signs of life', the surgeon said. They then began work on the mother. 'More than 30 minutes of resuscitation of the mother didn't produce results,' Mr Marin said on Saturday. 'Both died.'" [3]

Despite this carnage, both the Chinese and the Indians support the Russians and refused to vote for a resolution (at the United Nations) which demands that the Russian military exit Ukraine. [4]

The Chinese intend to provide economic and military aid to Russia so that its military operation can continue unabated in Ukraine. "The US has told allies that China signalled its willingness to provide military assistance after Russia requested equipment including surface-to-air missiles to support its invasion of Ukraine, according to officials familiar with American diplomatic cables on the exchange." [5]

The Indians will help the Russians to evade the economic sanctions enacted by Western govenment to punish the Russians for their invading Ukraine. "Indian officials said last week that they may even help Russia find workarounds for the new sanctions by setting up rupee accounts to continue trade with Moscow, similar to what it did after the annexation of Crimea." [6]

In other words, the cruelty of Chinese and Indians is exceeded by only the savagery of Africans and Hispanics.

note
1. David Patrikarakos, "The West must make Putin pay", UnHerd, 2022 March 11.
2. "Egregious sieges: The dire fate of Mariupol is a warning to other Ukrainian cities", The Economist, 2022 March 13.
3. Dan Sales, "Pregnant woman and her baby die after Ukraine hospital bombing: Mother-to-be in image that shocked the world begged doctors 'kill me now' as she realized child would not survive and medics battled to save her", Daily Mail, 2022 March 14.
4. "Mr Xi places a bet on Russia", The Economist, 2022 March 12.
5. Demetri Sevastopulo, "US tells allies China signalled openness to providing Russia with military support", Financial Times, 2022 March 14.
6. Sui-Lee Wee, Emily Schmall, and Sameer Yasir, "‘We Are on Our Side’: Across Asia, a Mixed Reaction to Ukraine War", The New York Times, 2022 March 2.

Hispanicizing the United States of America

(If you encounter a problem upon clicking any Web link related to Tucker Carlson Tonight, then please copy the link into the address bar of the browser and open the new Web page in a separate tab.)

Tucker Carlson is the host of Tucker Carlson Tonight. During the broadcast on 2021 September 22, Carlson noted the flood of Haitians into the United States. On previous nights, he reported on the flood of Hispanics.

He has wondered aloud why the presidential administration of Joe Biden has maintained open borders in order to flood the country with people who reject Western culture. He finally determined an explanation and presented it in the form of a quote that Biden himself uttered as Vice President in 2015.

Here is the quote.

An unrelenting stream of immigration. Nonstop, nonstop. Folks like me who are Caucasian, of European descent, for the first time in 2017 we'll be an absolute minority in the United States of America. Absolute minority. Fewer than 50% of the people in America from then and on will be white European stock. That's not a bad thing. That's a source of our strength.

In other words, he wants to make Africans, Hispanics, South Asians, and other non-Europeans the dominant majority in the United States. He wants to put European-Americans at the mercy of people who reject Western culture and who, consequuently, destroyed the societies in their own native lands before fleeing to the United States. He implicitly wants to do the same to the East-Asian-Americans who have assimilated into Western culture.

Open borders has already changed the political landscape in California. "[Hispanics] are the largest ethnic group [at 40% of residents] in the state and make up roughly 30 percent of registered voters. They have propelled Democratic victories in California for decades, helping the party win supermajorities in both houses of the State Legislature, where Latino senators and Assembly members hold powerful positions and pass some of the most immigrant-friendly legislation in the country." [3] Hispanics use the power of government to give themselves preferential treatment in education, employment, and immigration. Such treatement is gross discrimination against Europeans.

An ominous omen of injustices to come is the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) of 2021. [1] The ARPA includes a provision to pay off the loans either provided or guaranteed by the United States Department of Agriculture. This debt relief is for 120% of the value of the indebtedness.

The ARPA restricts this financial assistance to farmers who are African, Hispanic, Asian, or Native American. In other words, the ARPA excludes European-American farmers from this debt relief.

Raphael Warnock, an African sentaor from Georgia, sponsored this anti-European provision in the ARPA. [2] Representing the values of Martin Luther King, Warnock expressed pride at hurting European-Americans. All Africans and Hispanics in the Democratic Party voted for ARPA.

During the broadcast of Tucker Carlson Tonight on 2022 January 10, Carlson reported that, after Joe Biden won the presidential race in 2020, both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) took steps to give Hispanics, Africans, and other non-Europeans priority for lifesaving vaccines and other medical treatment. The intent is to harm European-Americans in retaliation for discrimination practiced by other European-Americans in prior centuries.

The weekly tracking poll by The Economist shows that Hispanics have supported Biden and his anti-European policies for the entire duration of his presidency to date. Africans have also supported Biden for the entire duration.

note
1. "American Rescue Plan and Agriculture, Measure Includes Billions in Aid for Disadvantaged Farmers", Farm Policy News, University of Illinois, 2021 March 9.
2. "Racial reparations at the USDA", The Hill, 2021 June 22.
3. "Latinos Shape California. Why Are So Many Sitting Out the Recall?", New York Times, 2021 September 7.
4. William H. Frey, "The Avenue: The US will become ‘minority white’ in 2045, Census projects", Brookings Institution, 2018 March 14.
5. 4. Larry Sand, "Eye on the News: California, There We Went", City Journal, Manhattan Institute, 2022 April 7.

According to a recent report, California now leads the country in illiteracy. In fact, 23.1 percent of Californians over age 15 cannot read this sentence.

Why should we vote for Donald Trump? President Kamala Harris

If Joe Biden wins the election, he will assume office at the age of 78. During his term, as the oldest person to become president, he may succumb to infirmity or, worse, the coronavirus, and Kamala Harris would ascend to the presidency.

How would President Harris govern?

1. She would use every opportunity to highlight African or Hispanic victimhood.

On January 29, 2019, Jussie Smollett told police that 2 supporters of Donald Trump had assaulted him. Because Smollett is African, Harris did not wait for the outcome of the police investigation and promptly declared that the alleged incident is an "attempted modern-day lynching".

Later, the investigation determined that Smollet had paid 2 friends to stage the attack. It was a hoax. [1] [2]

2. She would maintain or expand affirmative action and other forms of preferential treatment for Africans and Hispanics.

On November 4, 2015, Harris filed an amicus brief in the Supreme Court to persuade the Justices to rule against Abigail Fisher in her attempt to terminate affirmative action at the University of Texas. [3]

Also, Harris supports a recent Californian bill (which her political ally, Governor Gavin Newsom, signed into law on September 30, 2020) that specifies a quota for Africans and HIspanics on the boards of directors for companies headquartered in California. [4]

Harris supports Proportion 16 (on the 2020 ballot in California), which allows preferential treatment for Africans and Hispanics in public hiring, contracting, and college admissions. [5]

3. She would maintain "open borders".

At a confirmation hearing on November 15, 2018, Harris asserted that Immigration and Customs Enforcement has the same operating principle as the Ku Klux Klan. She insinuated that attempts to enforce the border are tantamount to terrorizing Africans and Hispanics. [6]

4. She would use government mandates to curtail civil liberties.

On July 4, 2019, Harris declared support for federally mandated busing. It violates the right of your child to freedom of association with the school of his or your choosing. [7]

Further, Harris supports using draconian lockdowns (like that imposed by Governor Gavin Newsom) to combat the coronavirus. Lockdowns curtail civil liberties by forcing citizens to shutdown private businesses, by mandating the use of masks, etc. [8]

5. She would shift responsibility from the individual to the government.

Harris claims that 215,000 Americans succumbed to the coronavirus due to the incompetence of the presidential administration. She specifically accuses Donald Trump of causing those deaths.

Yet, an effective response to the coronavirus primarily depends on the proper behavior of ordinary Americans, not politicians. Each individual must take responsibility to act responsibly; it cannot be transferred to the government.

The impact of Harris' governance would be transforming the United States into a country that is inhospitable for European-Americans and assimilated East-Asian-Americans. Europeans would shoulder all the blame for the underperformance of Africans and Hispanics. The presidential administration would directly or indirectly (via affirmative action) transfer resources from Europeans and East Asians to Africans and Hispanics to compensate for their underperformance. The "open borders" would facilitate swelling the ranks of underperforming ethnicities or races.

All the while, President Harris would claim that the underperformance of Africans and Hispanics is not due to their misbehavior but is due to the government's not doing enough for them.

As Senator, Harris has used that claim to explain away the fact that Africans and Hispanics constitute a disproportionately large percentage of coronavirus deaths. The situation in Japan proves that her claim is false. Prime Minister Shinzo Abe did little more than President Donald Trump in combating the coronavirus, yet the Japanese death rate due to the coronavirus is only about 2% of the American rate (where rate is death count divided by the population count). As of October 13, only about 1,631 Japanese have succumbed to the coronavirus. The excellent personal hygiene and courteousness (like covering nose and mouth during a cough) of the ordinary Japanese greatly inhibited the spread of the coronavirus to vulnerable groups like the elderly.

Under the leadership of President Harris, the United States would degenerate into a nation like Malaysia or Mexico. As a European-American or East-Asian-American parent, do you want your children to live in the kind of country that Donald Trump describes as a "shithole"?

The choice in the 2020 election is between President Kamala Harris (replacing an ailing President Joe Biden) and President Donald Trump. You may be tempted to support Harris because Trump has an extremely boorish personality. Yet, despite his faults, Trump has tried to ensure that American society is hospitable for you and your children.

Before you cast your vote, ask yourself, "Do I love my children more than I hate Trump's personality?" If the answer is "yes", then hold your nose and choose Trump for the sake of your children.

note
1. Jennifer Earl, "Kamala Harris on Jussie Smollett charges being dropped: 'I'm completely confused'", Fox News, 2019 March 27.
2. Paul Best, "Flashback: Kamala Harris once called Jussie Smollett's claims of an attack an 'attempted modern day lynching'", Fox News, 2020 Auguest 11.
3. "Attorney General Kamala D. Harris Files Brief in U.S. Supreme Court Affirmative Action Case, Fisher v. University of Texas>", State of California Department of Justice, 2015 November 4.
4. Patrick McGreevy, "Newsom signs law mandating more diversity in California corporate boardrooms", Los Angeles Times, 2020 Septembr 30.
5. Michael R Blood, "Election could move California further left on taxes, race", Associated Press. 2020 September 30.
6. Adam Shaw, "Flashback: Kamala Harris compared ICE to KKK in Senate hearing", Fox News, 2020 August 11.
7. Matt Stevens, "When Kamala Harris and Joe Biden Clashed on Busing and Segregation", New York Times, 2019 July 31.
8. Matt Stevens, "Harris said 'nobody's going to be punished’ for violating proposed mask mandate.", New York Times, 2020 August 28.

Coronavirus: Japan

According to a report by The Guardian, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe of Japan declared a state of emergency on April 7 in order to combat the coronavirus. The declaration applies to Tokyo and six other prefectures: Chiba, Kanagawa, Saitama, Osaka, Hyogo, and Fukuoka. "The declaration will give prefectural governors the authority to call on people to stay at home and for non-essential businesses to close, but will stop some way short of the stricter lockdowns in the US and parts of Europe. Japan's government does not have the legal authority to enforce a France-style lockdown with fines and other penalties."

According to a report by NPR, "The declaration, which falls under a law revised just last month in response to the pandemic, would allow governors of hard-hit prefectures to issue stay-at-home directives to contain the spread of the potentially deadly disease. Even so, Japanese law specifies no punishment for those who do not comply and does not grant the authority to ban business activity. Without the threat of coercion to back it up, the declaration of an emergency would rely on voluntary compliance."

According to a report by Nikkei Asian Review, the government of Tokyo prefecture will not request the closure of a wide range of businesses, including "restaurants and izakaya pubs". In an essay published by the New York Times, Motoko Rich confirms that "restaurants and bars may stay open until 8 p.m."

In other words, the Japanese strategy for handling the coronavirus pandemic resembles the Swedish strategy. The trust strategy in Japan and Sweden protects civil liberties.

According to a report by NPR, Abe expanded the state of emergency to the entire nation on April 16. According to a report by The Guardian and a report by Reuters, Abe on May 4 extended the state of emergency to May 31.

Because the Japanese strategy has greatly slowed the spread of the coronavirus, Abe lifted the state of emergency across most of Japan on May 14, according to a report by the BBC.

How effective is the Japanese strategy? As of September 1 (09:22 GMT), 1279 of 126.5 million Japanese succumbed to the coronavirus, and 187,737 of 328.2 million Americans died from it. The Japanese death rate of 10.11 deaths per million people is about 2% of the American rate of 572.02 deaths per million.

Could the low number of Japanese deaths be the result of undercounting the actual number?

According to a report by Bloomberg News, "Tokyo has not seen an increase in overall deaths during the coronavirus outbreak, boosting Japanese officials' assertions that they have largely kept infections under control despite criticism over the limited scope of its testing." The lack of excess mortality confirms that the 777 deaths are not an undercount of the actual number of deaths caused by the coronavirus. (In an essay published by Torkyo Review, Rob Fahey and Paul Nadeau observed that "excess mortality and hospital capacity data seems to confirm the low [coronavirus] death rate [in Japan].")

What is the principal contributing factor to the success of the trust strategy in Japan?

In an essay published by South China Morning Post, Neil Newman suggests that superior personal hygiene hindered the spread of the coronavirus in Japan. "In Japanese homes, shoes come off at the front door, hands are washed, throats are gargled and it is not uncommon to give groceries a wipe before putting anything in the fridge."

In an essay published by Foreign Policy, William Sposato gives the same explanation. "In general, however, Japan's culture of concern for others, keeping a distance, avoiding handshakes, and good personal hygiene appears to have played a significant, if difficult to measure, part in the low numbers."

In other words, the principal contributing factor is the culture of the nation. The strict immigration laws in Japan have maintained a single dominant culture that has high quality. Japanese culture has greatly helped to slow the spread of the coronavirus to vulnerable segments (like elderly people) of the population.

By contrast, the multicultural diversity of the United States (with its millions of Hispanic illegal aliens) has facilitated the coronavirus' killing a relatively large percentage of Americans. For the last several decades, most Americans of non-European ancestry have claimed that multicultural diversification (which is mostly synonymous with ethnic, racial, and gender diversification) makes organizations and processes more creative and productive. Treating this claim as a "truth" of life, politicians, bureaucrats, and administrators have applied multicultural diversification to all organizations and processes in the United States. The end result is organizations and processes that failed to appropriately handle the coronavirus, leading to a relatively high rate of death. The impact of the coronavirus has proven that multicultural diversification is a liability, not an asset, for American society.

note
1. According to a report by The Hill, "[Monocultural] South Korea's foreign ministry said Sunday that it had donated two million medical face masks to the [multicultural] U.S. to help fill shortages in hospitals hit hardest by the coronavirus."
2. According to a report by The Hill, "[Multicultural] Maryland has obtained 500,000 coronavirus tests from [monocultural] South Korea, Gov. Larry Hogan (R) announced Monday, as states push to increase their testing capacity."
3. According to a report by Bloomberg News, "No restrictions were placed on residents' movements, and businesses from restaurants to hairdressers stayed open. No high-tech apps that tracked people's movements were deployed. The country doesn't have a center for disease control. And even as nations were exhorted to 'test, test, test,' Japan has tested just 0.2% of its population — one of the lowest rates among developed countries." In other words, the Japanese used the Swedish strategy to successfully combat the coronavirus.
4. According to a report by The Guardian, "Masks are a common sight during the winter flu season, and in spring among people with hay fever. The custom of bowing rather than shaking hands or hugging, generally high standards of personal hygiene, and the removal of shoes when entering homes have all been held up as possible explanations for Japan's low infection rate." In other words, the culture of the Japanese helped them to successfully combat the coronavirus.

Coronavirus: Sweden

The man who is being interviewed in the above photo is Dr. Anders Tegnell, the chief epidemiologist at the Public Health Agency (PHA) in Sweden. He devised its national strategy for handling the coronavirus (COVID-19). According to an essay published by Foreign Affairs, "Rather than declare a lockdown or a state of emergency, Sweden asked its citizens to practice social distancing on a mostly voluntary basis. Swedish authorities imposed some restrictions designed to flatten the curve: no public gatherings of more than 50 people, no bar service, distance learning in high schools and universities, and so on. But they eschewed harsh controls, fines, and policing." The strategy relies on the intelligence and responsible behavior of the Swedes.

In other words, the strategy relies on trust between the government and the citizens. The government trusts the citizens to act responsibly, and the latter trusts the government to make sound recommendations based on science.

An alternative to the trust strategy is the authoritarian strategy deployed by the Chinese government and the Californian government. Both governments use the police to shutdown their economies, to enforce social distancing, etc.

By contrast, the Swedish government (under Prime Minister Stefan Löfven) allowed its economy to operate mostly normally. According got a report by The Economist, "Swedes largely approve of their country's approach, with two-thirds saying in polls that the government is handling the epidemic well." Also, according to a report by The Christian Science Monitor, the health agencies in both Denmark and Finland recommended the trust strategy, but the Danish and Finnish governments chose the authoritarian strategy.

In an interview with Joyce Barnathan of the International Center for Journalists and an interview with Stephen Sackur of HARDtalk (which is produced by BBC World News), Dr. Tegnell explains aspects of the trust strategy.

The previous chief epidemiologist at the PHA is Dr. Johan Giesecke. He had hired Dr. Tegnell. In an interview published by UnHerd, Dr. Giesecke provides additional details about the Swedish strategy.

How effective is the trust strategy? As of September 1 (09:22 GMT), 5,808 of 10.23 million Swedes succumbed to the coronavirus, and 187,737 of 328.2 million Americans died from it. The Swedish death rate of 568 deaths per million people is about 127% of the American rate of 572 deaths per million.

Those rates are based on undercounts of the actual number of coronavirus deaths. If we use the number of excess deaths (suggested by a report from The Economist and a report from the New York Times) to estimate the actual number of deaths, then the Swedish death rate would be even lower than the American death rate.

Finally, if we include the deaths of despair due to job loss caused by the authoritarian strategy, the overall Swedish death rate would also be lower than the overall American death rate.

note
1. The coronavirus strategy in Japan resembles the trust strategy in Sweden.
2. California has a large number of residents (e.g., Hispanics) who reject Western culture, of which civil liberties are an important component. Such anti-Westerners support using the power of the state to compel Californians to wear face masks, to socially distance, and to close non-essential businesses. Uncontrolled immigration has changed the character of California and most other states.
3. According to a report by the New York Times, "'Today, all of the European countries are more or less following the Swedish model, combined with the testing, tracing and quarantine procedures the Germans have introduced, but none will admit it,' said Antoine Flahault, director of the Institute of Global Health, in Geneva. 'Instead, they made a caricature out of the Swedish strategy. Almost everyone has called it inhumane and a failure.'"
4. According to an analysis published by Foreign Affairs, "in the United States, which has by far the highest absolute number of reported COVID-19 deaths, several states are easing restrictions at the urging of President Donald Trump, who despite bashing the Swedish model, is pushing the country toward something very similar."

Immigrants from South Asia

The overwhelming majority of South Asians — like Sundar Pichai (CEO of Google) and Satya Nadella (CEO of Microsoft) — who came to the United States are members of already wealthy families in their native lands overseas. [1] Consider Indians. Before coming to our country, they often already received a college education in India, where many people are still impoverished and illiterate. These elites come to the United States because they want to obtain lucrative jobs in order to become even wealthier.

Such Indians believe that Indian culture is better than Western culture. (Since they enjoy lives of privilege in India, why would they think otherwise?) They refuse to assimilate into Western society, retain their Indian names, and give Indian names to their children. Such anti-Western immigrants favor celebrating Diwali festival instead of Christmas. They inculcate their children with the anti-Western notion that Indian culture is superior to Western culture.

What is the mentality of immigrants who do assimilate into Western society? Consider the father of Daniel Inouye. Before Daniel Inouye departed for the training camp of the U.S. Army, his father told him, "America has been good to us. It has given me two jobs. It has given you and your sisters and brothers education. We all love this country. Whatever you do, do not dishonor your country. Remember –- never dishonor your family. And if you must give your life, do so with honor." [2]

Who is Daniel Inouye? He is a former senator from Hawaii. His attitude and the attitude of his father toward American society were common among many immigrants who came from Japan and Europe in the first 65 years of the 20th century. [12]

Such a pro-Western attitude does not exist among the millions of more recent immigrants and opportunists (who came to the United States by directly enrolling in an American university) from South Asia. Consider Sikhs from India. With assistance from the Sikh Coalition, they used lawsuits to demand that the Department of Defense (DOD) allow them to maintain a beard and to wear a turban. [3] [4] [5] [6] Consequently, the DOD granted the Sikhs permission to maintain this aspect of their native culture at the expense of Western culture. [8] [9] [10] [11] Additional Sikhs with assistance from (again) the Sikh Coalition are now demanding that the United States Military Academy stop requiring them to wear the traditional, ceremonial hat during military parades. [7]

South Asians view ordinary Americans of European (or East Asian) ancestry with arrogance and scorn. When South Asians run companies in Silicon Valley, they clamor for H-1B visas even when there are thousands of unemployed, ordinary Americans who are ready to work.

The presence of South Asians damages Western society.

note
1. "A model minority: How Indians triumphed in America", "The Economist", 2016 November 26.
2. "Daniel Inouye: A Japanese American Soldier's Valor in World War II", National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior.
3. Kevin Lilley, "Sikh Army captain sues DoD to keep beard, turban", "Army Times", 2016 March 1.
4. Corey Dickstein, "Sikh soldier’s lawsuit stops Army test; seeks to keep beard, turban", "Stars and Stripes", 2016 March 1.
5. Kevin Lilley, "3 Sikh soldiers file lawsuit to keep beards, turbans", "Army Times", 2016 March 29.
6. Corey Dickstein, "Sikh Army enlistees file lawsuit seeking beard, turban exemptions", "Stars and Stripes", 2016 March 30.
7. Lorraine Bailey, "Sikh Cadets Object to Wearing West Point ‘Tar Bucket’ ", 2017 August 14.
8. Dave Philipps, "Sikh Captain Says Keeping Beard and Turban Lets Him Serve U.S. and Faith", 2016 April 1.
9. Corey Dickstein, "Army grants 3 Sikh enlistees beard, turban exemptions", 2016 April 11.
10. Frances Kai-Hwa Wang, "Army Grants Accommodations to 3 Sikh-American Soldiers to Serve with Turbans, Beards", 2016 April 12.
11. Corey Dickstein, "More bearded, turbaned Sikhs join Army as Pentagon reviews religious articles ban", 2017 February 24.
12. In an op-ed published by KQED Radio, Misa Sugiura stated that her parents embraced assimilation into Western society. "When my parents came to America in the late 60s, they came prepared to embrace a brand new life. Instead of a trunk full of old Japanese holiday traditions, they came with an empty calendar to fill with new American ones." This attitude differs starkly from the attitude of the typical South Asian.
13. According to a report published by The Hill, a bill in the House of Representatives and a bill in the Senate "would remove the country quotas to assign permanent residency permits or green cards, a longstanding demand of the Indian-American community, but the Durbin-Leahy version would also increase the number of green cards granted per year." The Indians in the United States come from the wealthy and privileged classes in India and believe that, due to their wealth, they are entitled to freely travel to and permanently stay in any country that they want. So, they demand that the American government terminate all quotas which limit granting permanent residency to Indians.
14. According to a report by Fox News, "Hari Sevugan, a former spokesman for the Democratic National Committee and for President [Barack] Obama, indicated that he was part of the accountability project [to create a blacklist of all supporters of Donald Trump]." Sevugan was born in India and hrings its culture to the United States. Blacklisting people whom you dislike is an integral part of Indian culture.

Preferential Treatment for Hispanics

Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), a program in the executive branch of the American government, allows the children (who are not American citizens) of illegal aliens to legally reside and work in the the United States. According to data provided by the Pew Research Center, Hispanics (from Latin America) constitute approximately 98% of the participants in DACA. According to a report by "National Review", 72% of them have lived in the United States for 10 years.

While Hispanic illegal aliens were helping their children to illegally enjoy the privilege of living for 10+ years in the United States, many faceless and nameless children in, say, Vietnam were languishing in poverty and overall misery during the same 10+ years because their Vietnamese parents respect American laws and were waiting in line to enter the United States.

The ill-gotten privilege of living in this country for 10+ years is not enough for these Hispanics. They want even more preferential treatment. They now loudly demand a path to American citizenship, according to a report by Politico and a report by "The Washington Post". Yielding to this demand for preferential treatment, many politicians support legislation which gives American citizenship to Hispanic participants in DACA, according to a report by "The Economist".

Allowing the children of Hispanic illegal aliens to permanently stay in the United States is grossly unfair to Asians (and Europeans). Millions of impoverished people in Vietnam (and Eastern Europe), for example, want to bring their children to the United States but wait in line for years.

Hispanics cut in front of the immigration line, shoving Asians to the end of the line.

Furthermore, Hispanics receive preferential treatment via affirmative action (AA) in education and employment. According to a report by CNN, an American of Asian ancestry must score roughly 270 points higher than a Hispanic, on the Scholastic Aptitude Test, in order for the admissions committee (of Princeton University) to give the Asian equal consideration with the Hispanic.

Hispanics cut in front of the education line, shoving Asian-Americans to the end of the line.

Hispanics expect, demand, and receive preferential treatment from most politicians. Why are Hispanics such selfish bigots?

note
In New York City, the Specialized High School Institute (SHSI) prepares economically disadvantaged children to take the admissions test for entering specialized high schools (SHS) like the Bronx High School of Science. According to a report by the "New York Times" and a report by the "New York Post", the city government had prohibited the admission of Asian-Americans or European-Americans into SHSI in order to give preferential treatment to Africans and Hispanics. Assisted by a public-interest law firm, some Asian-American parents successfully used a lawsuit to force the government to open SHSI admissions to Asians and Europeans in 2008. Afterwards, Africans, Hispanics, and their political accomplices began scheming to reduce Asian and European enrollment in SHS, according to a report by the "New York Post".

Savagery of Africans and Middle Easterners in France

According to a report by the "Daily Express", a report by "The Daily Mail", a report by "The Mirror", a report by "The Sun", and a report by Fox News, a policewoman and her supervisor went to a house in Champigny-sur-Marne (which is southeast of Paris) to investigate a disturbance on January 1. Upon arriving at the house, the 2 police officers were savagely beaten by a horde of Africans and Middle Easterners. After the policewoman collapsed to the ground, the thugs tried to repeatedly kick her head. In the above photo, the officer is sobbing loudly and is desperately trying to protect her head from the relentless blows.

BFM TV in France has posted a video clip on YouTube.

The French now understand the savagery that Americans of Asian or European ancestry have endured at the hands of Africans and Hispanics in the United States. The latter 2 groups commit approximately 63% of all murders. [1]

The primary cause of this savagery is not poverty. Consider the data that the World Bank provides about gross domestic product (GDP) and intentional homicide. According to the data for 2011, Mexico has a GDP per capita of $15,923 (at purchasing-power parity), and Vietnam has a GDP per capita of $4,716. Yet, the Mexicans commit murder at the rate of 22.6 per 100,000 people, and the Vietnamese commit murder at the rate of 1.5 per 100,000 people. In other words, a typical Mexican has 3.4 times the wealth of a typical Vietnamese but has 15 times his likelihood of committing murder.

The primary cause of African, Hispanic, and Middle-Eastern savagery is culture and genetics.

note
1. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) provides statistics about the number of arrests for murder. The percentages of arrests (for murder) for various ethnicities or races approximately equals the percentages of murders committed by the corresponding ethnicities or races. So, Africans commit about 52% of all murders in the United States, and Hispanics commit about 22%. Both percentages include thugs who consider themselves to be simultaneously African and Hispanic. An in-depth analysis of such statistics is provided by theclearsky.blogspot.com .

Bloc Voting by Africans and Hispanics

According to a report by "The Economist" wrote, Doug Jones won the special election to fill the seat of Jefferson Sessions (who became the Attorney General) in the Senate.

According to another report by "The Economist", "Black voters, who usually comprise around a quarter of Alabama’s electorate, turned out in droves. Exit polls suggest they made up 29%, and that Mr Jones won 96% of their votes."

Africans and Hispanics consistently vote as a bloc typically to get preferential treatment (e.g., affirmative action) from political candidates. Also, Africans and Hispanics prefer candidates who have, respectively, African or Hispanic ancestry. This voting pattern has altered the character of the United States.

By contrast, Americans of European ancestry (and, to a lesser extent, Asian ancestry) do not vote as a bloc. They look at various sides of important issues before casting a vote for a political candidate, and if 2 candidates have similar political positions, European-Americans roughly evenly split their votes for them. European-Americans do not seek preferential treatment and do oppose using ancestry as a criteria for supporting a candidate.

The Democratic primaries in 2008 are instructive. During an interview conducted by CNN, a Democratic strategist noted that the political positions of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama were nearly identical. Yet, roughly 80% of the votes from African-Americans went to Obama. The Africans clearly voted as a bloc — and on the basis of skin color.

By contrast, European-Americans roughly evenly split their votes between Clinton and Obama. The demographic breakdown reported by the "New York Times" for California is typical for the votes in the Democratic primaries. Bloc voting by Africans explains why Clinton lost the Democratic nomination for president in 2008.

The voting pattern of Africans and Hispanics is a stark warning to the French, the Germans, and other Europeans. African or Middle-Eastern immigrants (in Europe) and their descendants also vote as a bloc typically to get preferential treatment. After their percentage of the overall population reaches 20%, their behavior will permanently alter the character of the European nations.

note
In an interview conducted by National Public Radio (NPR), a Hispanic voter stated, "I think it's gonna basically deflate Donald Trump and I think this race – my crystal ball is a little foggy but I think it's gonna come down to the two Cubans, Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio, and I think one of them will be our nominee this summer. And as a young, Latino conservative, I'm very, very excited about that." Like Africans, this Hispanic voter unabashedly advocates using ancestry as a criteria for supporting a political candidate.